Shroud of turin second carbon dating
The second face supports the idea of a chemical reaction and adds more proof that the image is not a work of art or a photograph.
And in 2005, we learned that the carbon 14 dating was flawed.
I was so convinced that the Shroud of Turin was a fake that I doubted the images were negatives. I was certain that no artist, no craftsman, no faker of relics, could possibly paint a negative of a human face.
To do so is like trying to write your signature upside down and backwards.
Starting in 2003, new evidence began to appear in that supported the Shroud of Turin’s authenticity.Our knowledge of this time in history rightly conditions us to be suspicious of any relic that might appear in Europe at this time. In metaphoric parlance, the Shroud of Turin was never a blip on my radar screen.And it would have likely remained that way were it not for a single enigmatic fact that Cahill mentioned: the picture on the Shroud of Turin was a negative. But rather than marveling at this fact, I doubted it.From these journals we learn that the outermost fibers of the cloth are coated with a layer of starch fractions and various saccharides.In places, the coating has turned into a caramel-like substance, thus forming the images. We learn, also, of a faint second image of the face on the backside of the cloth.
Search for shroud of turin second carbon dating:
Our minds are programmed for the way we see things in the world; a world where black is black and white is white.